openejb m2 groupId

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

openejb m2 groupId

David Jencks
The contents of the m1 and m2 build openejb jars are necessarily  
somewhat different, so it's desirable that they have different names:  
otherwise the geronimo m2 configs build tends to pick up m1 openejb  
jars.  I think the easiest way to do this is to give the m2 jars m2  
style groupIds.  To get this started I changed the m2 openejb build  
to use org.openejb.  If this is the wrong groupId let me know what is  
more correct and I will change it.

  thanks
david jencks


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: openejb m2 groupId

dblevins
Administrator
That's cool.  That's what we're using in the 3 branch.

On Jul 2, 2006, at 12:20 PM, David Jencks wrote:

> The contents of the m1 and m2 build openejb jars are necessarily  
> somewhat different, so it's desirable that they have different  
> names: otherwise the geronimo m2 configs build tends to pick up m1  
> openejb jars.  I think the easiest way to do this is to give the m2  
> jars m2 style groupIds.  To get this started I changed the m2  
> openejb build to use org.openejb.  If this is the wrong groupId let  
> me know what is more correct and I will change it.
>
>  thanks
> david jencks
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: openejb m2 groupId

dblevins
Administrator
Go for it.  You just need to add the root pom of openejb.  Login,  
then click "Add Maven 2.0 Project" and use https://svn.codehaus.org/ 
blah/blah/openejb2/pom.xml as the pom url.

-David

On Jul 2, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

> Can we get Ci to build and deploy artifacts from the openejb2 m2  
> build with these new groupId's so that the G m2 build can start  
> using them?
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Jul 2, 2006, at 12:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> That's cool.  That's what we're using in the 3 branch.
>>
>> On Jul 2, 2006, at 12:20 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>> The contents of the m1 and m2 build openejb jars are necessarily  
>>> somewhat different, so it's desirable that they have different  
>>> names: otherwise the geronimo m2 configs build tends to pick up  
>>> m1 openejb jars.  I think the easiest way to do this is to give  
>>> the m2 jars m2 style groupIds.  To get this started I changed the  
>>> m2 openejb build to use org.openejb.  If this is the wrong  
>>> groupId let me know what is more correct and I will change it.
>>>
>>>  thanks
>>> david jencks
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>>>
>>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>
>>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: openejb m2 groupId

Alan Cabrera
In reply to this post by David Jencks
David Jencks wrote:
> The contents of the m1 and m2 build openejb jars are necessarily
> somewhat different, so it's desirable that they have different names:
> otherwise the geronimo m2 configs build tends to pick up m1 openejb
> jars.  I think the easiest way to do this is to give the m2 jars m2
> style groupIds.  To get this started I changed the m2 openejb build to
> use org.openejb.  If this is the wrong groupId let me know what is
> more correct and I will change it.

Makes sense to me.

Regards,
Alan



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

Loading...