Tomee Arquillian for Jakarta EE 9

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Tomee Arquillian for Jakarta EE 9

hantsy bai
Hi,

I created a starter boilerplate project for Jakarta EE 9 applications,
https://github.com/hantsy/jakartaee9-starter-boilerplate

But currently I can not find a Arquillian integration for the Apache TomEE.

http://tomee.apache.org/arquillian-available-adapters.html

BTW, for the existing adapters, I have a question there the **Remote**
adapter worked on a local managed Tomee, it is the **manged** in my mind.
For my experience, the remote adapters to try to test against the running
servers.


Regards
Hantsy
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Tomee Arquillian for Jakarta EE 9

David Blevins-2
Hi Hantsy!

First, thank you for reaching out and thinking of TomEE, that's wonderful.  I know you're working with many app server teams to get this goal accomplished.

We're achieving our Jakarta EE 9 support through bytecode transformation of the zips themselves.  We have not yet expanded that to the Arquillian Adapters.  We definitely should do that, but I'm not sure when that will happen.  [note to the general community, if you want to work on that, just pop on the dev@ list and say so and we'll fill you up with pointers and support]

On Remote vs Managed, our Remote adapter does both based on the configuration.  I think it might be worth it to explicitly split that adapter in two and name each appropriately just to avoid confusion, but the functionality for each should be there.


--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com

> On Dec 5, 2020, at 11:02 PM, hantsy bai <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I created a starter boilerplate project for Jakarta EE 9 applications,
> https://github.com/hantsy/jakartaee9-starter-boilerplate
>
> But currently I can not find a Arquillian integration for the Apache TomEE.
>
> http://tomee.apache.org/arquillian-available-adapters.html
>
> BTW, for the existing adapters, I have a question there the **Remote**
> adapter worked on a local managed Tomee, it is the **manged** in my mind.
> For my experience, the remote adapters to try to test against the running
> servers.
>
>
> Regards
> Hantsy


smime.p7s (1K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Tomee Arquillian for Jakarta EE 9

hantsy bai
Thanks, David.  Hope to get update of the Arquiillian adapters soon.

*Hantsy Bai*

Self-employed consultant, fullstack developer, agile coach

GitHub: https://github.com/hantsy

Twitter: https://twitter.com/@hantsy
Medium: https://medium.com/@hantsy


On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 6:51 AM David Blevins <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hi Hantsy!
>
> First, thank you for reaching out and thinking of TomEE, that's
> wonderful.  I know you're working with many app server teams to get this
> goal accomplished.
>
> We're achieving our Jakarta EE 9 support through bytecode transformation
> of the zips themselves.  We have not yet expanded that to the Arquillian
> Adapters.  We definitely should do that, but I'm not sure when that will
> happen.  [note to the general community, if you want to work on that, just
> pop on the dev@ list and say so and we'll fill you up with pointers and
> support]
>
> On Remote vs Managed, our Remote adapter does both based on the
> configuration.  I think it might be worth it to explicitly split that
> adapter in two and name each appropriately just to avoid confusion, but the
> functionality for each should be there.
>
>
> --
> David Blevins
> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
> > On Dec 5, 2020, at 11:02 PM, hantsy bai <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I created a starter boilerplate project for Jakarta EE 9 applications,
> > https://github.com/hantsy/jakartaee9-starter-boilerplate
> >
> > But currently I can not find a Arquillian integration for the Apache
> TomEE.
> >
> > http://tomee.apache.org/arquillian-available-adapters.html
> >
> > BTW, for the existing adapters, I have a question there the **Remote**
> > adapter worked on a local managed Tomee, it is the **manged** in my mind.
> > For my experience, the remote adapters to try to test against the running
> > servers.
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Hantsy
>
>