Re: [openejb-scm] openejb/m2 openejb-builder.pom openejb-root.pom

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [openejb-scm] openejb/m2 openejb-builder.pom openejb-root.pom

Jacek Laskowski-3
1 Feb 2006 11:49:59 -0000, [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:
> dain        2006/02/01 06:49:59
>
>   Modified:    m2       openejb-builder.pom openejb-root.pom

>   -      <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
>   +      <version>1.0-local</version>

Hi Dain,

Would you explain the reason to use 1.0-local? Why is the change? I
can't find anything while looking up 'maven local version' in Google.

--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.org.pl
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: [openejb-scm] openejb/m2 openejb-builder.pom openejb-root.pom

Brett Porter-3
I was going to ask the same question :)

Good to see the m2 build being updated, though - thanks Dain! There are
a couple of other inconsistencies that would have crept in over time,
but the move to svn would be a good time to switch over (and probably
retain the m1 build) with the availability of svn mv and all :)

- Brett

Jacek Laskowski wrote:

> 1 Feb 2006 11:49:59 -0000, [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:
>> dain        2006/02/01 06:49:59
>>
>>   Modified:    m2       openejb-builder.pom openejb-root.pom
>
>>   -      <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
>>   +      <version>1.0-local</version>
>
> Hi Dain,
>
> Would you explain the reason to use 1.0-local? Why is the change? I
> can't find anything while looking up 'maven local version' in Google.
>
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.laskowski.org.pl
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Maven 2 conversion (was: Re: [openejb-dev] Re: [openejb-scm] openejb/m2 openejb-builder.pom openejb-root.pom)

dblevins
Administrator
On Feb 8, 2006, at 9:07 PM, Brett Porter wrote:

> I was going to ask the same question :)
>
> Good to see the m2 build being updated, though - thanks Dain! There  
> are
> a couple of other inconsistencies that would have crept in over time,
> but the move to svn would be a good time to switch over (and probably
> retain the m1 build) with the availability of svn mv and all :)
>

That was definitely in my mind.  I'd be happy to see us switch to m2  
finally.  What say the rest of you?

Brett, is there any easy way to install artifacts into an m1 repo as  
part of an m2 build?  Geronimo would need them obviously.

-David

> - Brett
>
> Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>> 1 Feb 2006 11:49:59 -0000, [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:
>>> dain        2006/02/01 06:49:59
>>>
>>>   Modified:    m2       openejb-builder.pom openejb-root.pom
>>
>>>   -      <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
>>>   +      <version>1.0-local</version>
>>
>> Hi Dain,
>>
>> Would you explain the reason to use 1.0-local? Why is the change? I
>> can't find anything while looking up 'maven local version' in Google.
>>
>> --
>> Jacek Laskowski
>> http://www.laskowski.org.pl
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Maven 2 conversion

Brett Porter-2
David Blevins wrote:
> Brett, is there any easy way to install artifacts into an m1 repo as
> part of an m2 build?  Geronimo would need them obviously.

Yes, I created a maven-one-plugin for xbean that does this:
http://maven.apache.org/sandbox/

If you need a hand in a couple of weeks, let me know (heads down next
week I'm afraid).

Cheers,
Brett
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: [openejb-scm] openejb/m2 openejb-builder.pom openejb-root.pom

Dain Sundstrom
In reply to this post by Brett Porter-3
I'm sorry.  That was just a mistake.  I'll roll it back it no one  
else has already.

-dain

On Feb 8, 2006, at 9:07 PM, Brett Porter wrote:

> I was going to ask the same question :)
>
> Good to see the m2 build being updated, though - thanks Dain! There  
> are
> a couple of other inconsistencies that would have crept in over time,
> but the move to svn would be a good time to switch over (and probably
> retain the m1 build) with the availability of svn mv and all :)
>
> - Brett
>
> Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>> 1 Feb 2006 11:49:59 -0000, [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:
>>> dain        2006/02/01 06:49:59
>>>
>>>   Modified:    m2       openejb-builder.pom openejb-root.pom
>>
>>>   -      <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
>>>   +      <version>1.0-local</version>
>>
>> Hi Dain,
>>
>> Would you explain the reason to use 1.0-local? Why is the change? I
>> can't find anything while looking up 'maven local version' in Google.
>>
>> --
>> Jacek Laskowski
>> http://www.laskowski.org.pl
>>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: [openejb-scm] openejb/m2 openejb-builder.pom openejb-root.pom

Dain Sundstrom
Should be reverted now... sorry it was a find/replace gone wild.

-dain

On Feb 10, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

> I'm sorry.  That was just a mistake.  I'll roll it back it no one  
> else has already.
>
> -dain
>
> On Feb 8, 2006, at 9:07 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
>> I was going to ask the same question :)
>>
>> Good to see the m2 build being updated, though - thanks Dain!  
>> There are
>> a couple of other inconsistencies that would have crept in over time,
>> but the move to svn would be a good time to switch over (and probably
>> retain the m1 build) with the availability of svn mv and all :)
>>
>> - Brett
>>
>> Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>>> 1 Feb 2006 11:49:59 -0000, [hidden email] <[hidden email]>:
>>>> dain        2006/02/01 06:49:59
>>>>
>>>>   Modified:    m2       openejb-builder.pom openejb-root.pom
>>>
>>>>   -      <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
>>>>   +      <version>1.0-local</version>
>>>
>>> Hi Dain,
>>>
>>> Would you explain the reason to use 1.0-local? Why is the change? I
>>> can't find anything while looking up 'maven local version' in  
>>> Google.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jacek Laskowski
>>> http://www.laskowski.org.pl
>>>