OpenEJB 3.1.1 release?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
8 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

OpenEJB 3.1.1 release?

Joe Bohn-3
Are there plans for an OpenEJB 3.1.1 release relatively soon?  We're
dependent on OpenEJB 3.1.1 for an upcoming Geronimo 2.2 release which we
hope to have released by mid January.

I also think there are still some tck issues posted on the Geronimo tck
list that need some investigating and might result in OpenEJB changes
for 3.1.1.  I'm hoping we can get some updated information on the tck
list regarding these ... but it sounds like issues still persist.

Thanks,
Joe
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenEJB 3.1.1 release?

Jacek Laskowski
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Joe Bohn <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Are there plans for an OpenEJB 3.1.1 release relatively soon?  We're
> dependent on OpenEJB 3.1.1 for an upcoming Geronimo 2.2 release which we
> hope to have released by mid January.

Noone raised it before yet OE 3.1.1 in mid January would be great to
have. The new year will certainly make people wish for new releases
and it'd be great to have OE 3.1.1 ready.

> I also think there are still some tck issues posted on the Geronimo tck list
> that need some investigating and might result in OpenEJB changes for 3.1.1.
>  I'm hoping we can get some updated information on the tck list regarding
> these ... but it sounds like issues still persist.

I wish I could help out with this even just a little, but can't claim
any time for it in the coming month. I haven't even read the tck
mailing list lately. Please report any issues wrt OpenEJB in JIRA if
Geronimo faces one. Heads-up/friendly reminder always appreciated, too
;-)

Jacek

--
Jacek Laskowski
Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenEJB 3.1.1 release?

Joe Bohn-3
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Joe Bohn <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Are there plans for an OpenEJB 3.1.1 release relatively soon?  We're
>> dependent on OpenEJB 3.1.1 for an upcoming Geronimo 2.2 release which we
>> hope to have released by mid January.
>
> Noone raised it before yet OE 3.1.1 in mid January would be great to
> have. The new year will certainly make people wish for new releases
> and it'd be great to have OE 3.1.1 ready.

Thanks for the response Jacek.  You are correct, we haven't been
straight-forward in this request.  I think it's been mentioned in the
past (probably on irc) and it has certainly been mentioned on the
Geronimo list but not directly here.


>
>> I also think there are still some tck issues posted on the Geronimo tck list
>> that need some investigating and might result in OpenEJB changes for 3.1.1.
>>  I'm hoping we can get some updated information on the tck list regarding
>> these ... but it sounds like issues still persist.
>
> I wish I could help out with this even just a little, but can't claim
> any time for it in the coming month. I haven't even read the tck
> mailing list lately. Please report any issues wrt OpenEJB in JIRA if
> Geronimo faces one. Heads-up/friendly reminder always appreciated, too
> ;-)

We'll do that if we can.  Sometimes the specifics of the failure
information reveal some tck info that must be limited to those with the
NDA signed ... so we often try to keep it just on the tck list.  First
thing we need to do it get a more recent report of the problems out on
the tck list.

Joe

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenEJB 3.1.1 release?

Dain Sundstrom
On Dec 2, 2008, at 1:48 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:

> Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Joe Bohn <[hidden email]>  
>> wrote:
>>> Are there plans for an OpenEJB 3.1.1 release relatively soon?  We're
>>> dependent on OpenEJB 3.1.1 for an upcoming Geronimo 2.2 release  
>>> which we
>>> hope to have released by mid January.
>> Noone raised it before yet OE 3.1.1 in mid January would be great to
>> have. The new year will certainly make people wish for new releases
>> and it'd be great to have OE 3.1.1 ready.
>
> Thanks for the response Jacek.  You are correct, we haven't been  
> straight-forward in this request.  I think it's been mentioned in  
> the past (probably on irc) and it has certainly been mentioned on  
> the Geronimo list but not directly here.

That would help me also.  Also, are there any specific JIRAs you need  
included?

>>> I also think there are still some tck issues posted on the  
>>> Geronimo tck list
>>> that need some investigating and might result in OpenEJB changes  
>>> for 3.1.1.
>>> I'm hoping we can get some updated information on the tck list  
>>> regarding
>>> these ... but it sounds like issues still persist.
>> I wish I could help out with this even just a little, but can't claim
>> any time for it in the coming month. I haven't even read the tck
>> mailing list lately. Please report any issues wrt OpenEJB in JIRA if
>> Geronimo faces one. Heads-up/friendly reminder always appreciated,  
>> too
>> ;-)
>
> We'll do that if we can.  Sometimes the specifics of the failure  
> information reveal some tck info that must be limited to those with  
> the NDA signed ... so we often try to keep it just on the tck list.  
> First thing we need to do it get a more recent report of the  
> problems out on the tck list.

If Jacek is interested in helping, can he sign the NDA and get access  
to the list?

-dain
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenEJB 3.1.1 release?

Jacek Laskowski
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Dain Sundstrom <[hidden email]> wrote:

> If Jacek is interested in helping, can he sign the NDA and get access to the
> list?

I've already subscribed, but hardly ever said anything (it's not my
point to say anything just for the sake of saying ;-))

Jacek

--
Jacek Laskowski
Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenEJB 3.1.1 release?

Joe Bohn-3
In reply to this post by Dain Sundstrom
Dain Sundstrom wrote:

> On Dec 2, 2008, at 1:48 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
>> Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Joe Bohn <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Are there plans for an OpenEJB 3.1.1 release relatively soon?  We're
>>>> dependent on OpenEJB 3.1.1 for an upcoming Geronimo 2.2 release
>>>> which we
>>>> hope to have released by mid January.
>>> Noone raised it before yet OE 3.1.1 in mid January would be great to
>>> have. The new year will certainly make people wish for new releases
>>> and it'd be great to have OE 3.1.1 ready.
>>
>> Thanks for the response Jacek.  You are correct, we haven't been
>> straight-forward in this request.  I think it's been mentioned in the
>> past (probably on irc) and it has certainly been mentioned on the
>> Geronimo list but not directly here.
>
> That would help me also.  Also, are there any specific JIRAs you need
> included?

No specific JIRAs that I'm aware of beyond whatever is necessary to fix
up tck.

>
>>>> I also think there are still some tck issues posted on the Geronimo
>>>> tck list
>>>> that need some investigating and might result in OpenEJB changes for
>>>> 3.1.1.
>>>> I'm hoping we can get some updated information on the tck list
>>>> regarding
>>>> these ... but it sounds like issues still persist.
>>> I wish I could help out with this even just a little, but can't claim
>>> any time for it in the coming month. I haven't even read the tck
>>> mailing list lately. Please report any issues wrt OpenEJB in JIRA if
>>> Geronimo faces one. Heads-up/friendly reminder always appreciated, too
>>> ;-)
>>
>> We'll do that if we can.  Sometimes the specifics of the failure
>> information reveal some tck info that must be limited to those with
>> the NDA signed ... so we often try to keep it just on the tck list.  
>> First thing we need to do it get a more recent report of the problems
>> out on the tck list.
>
> If Jacek is interested in helping, can he sign the NDA and get access to
> the list?
>
> -dain
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenEJB 3.1.1 release?

Dain Sundstrom
On Dec 4, 2008, at 10:46 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:

> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 1:48 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>>> Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Joe Bohn  
>>>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>> Are there plans for an OpenEJB 3.1.1 release relatively soon?  
>>>>> We're
>>>>> dependent on OpenEJB 3.1.1 for an upcoming Geronimo 2.2 release  
>>>>> which we
>>>>> hope to have released by mid January.
>>>> Noone raised it before yet OE 3.1.1 in mid January would be great  
>>>> to
>>>> have. The new year will certainly make people wish for new releases
>>>> and it'd be great to have OE 3.1.1 ready.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the response Jacek.  You are correct, we haven't been  
>>> straight-forward in this request.  I think it's been mentioned in  
>>> the past (probably on irc) and it has certainly been mentioned on  
>>> the Geronimo list but not directly here.
>> That would help me also.  Also, are there any specific JIRAs you  
>> need included?
>
> No specific JIRAs that I'm aware of beyond whatever is necessary to  
> fix up tck.

Ah so the TCK is not fully passing with OpenEJB 3.1?  Do you have a  
target date for the TCK?  A target date will help us plan a timely  
3.1.1 release for Geronimo.

-dain
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: OpenEJB 3.1.1 release?

Joe Bohn-3
Dain Sundstrom wrote:

> On Dec 4, 2008, at 10:46 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
>> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 1:48 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>>>> Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Joe Bohn <[hidden email]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Are there plans for an OpenEJB 3.1.1 release relatively soon?  We're
>>>>>> dependent on OpenEJB 3.1.1 for an upcoming Geronimo 2.2 release
>>>>>> which we
>>>>>> hope to have released by mid January.
>>>>> Noone raised it before yet OE 3.1.1 in mid January would be great to
>>>>> have. The new year will certainly make people wish for new releases
>>>>> and it'd be great to have OE 3.1.1 ready.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the response Jacek.  You are correct, we haven't been
>>>> straight-forward in this request.  I think it's been mentioned in
>>>> the past (probably on irc) and it has certainly been mentioned on
>>>> the Geronimo list but not directly here.
>>> That would help me also.  Also, are there any specific JIRAs you need
>>> included?
>>
>> No specific JIRAs that I'm aware of beyond whatever is necessary to
>> fix up tck.
>
> Ah so the TCK is not fully passing with OpenEJB 3.1?  Do you have a
> target date for the TCK?  A target date will help us plan a timely 3.1.1
> release for Geronimo.
>

Well, ideally it would be great if we could have the errors resolved by
the end of next week (that is our current target to branch Geronimo
trunk).

Joe