MicroProfile Fault Tolerance 1.1?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
8 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

MicroProfile Fault Tolerance 1.1?

David Blevins-2
Noticed we're using Fault Tolerance 1.0, whereas MicroProfile 2.0 has Fault Tolerance 1.1.

Is there a 1.1 implementation we can use?


--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: MicroProfile Fault Tolerance 1.1?

Roberto Cortez
Yes,

There is already a 1.1 Geronimo implementation compliant version (Safeguard). JL added it, but it was failing the TCK. We think we need to do some integration code to be able to use it properly. Bruno was going to do that, so we reverted back to 1.0 version so we can have a green build until we figure that out.

Please check the following thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E>

Cheers,
Roberto

> On 6 Jan 2019, at 19:47, David Blevins <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Noticed we're using Fault Tolerance 1.0, whereas MicroProfile 2.0 has Fault Tolerance 1.1.
>
> Is there a 1.1 implementation we can use?
>
>
> --
> David Blevins
> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: MicroProfile Fault Tolerance 1.1?

doychin@dsoft-bg.com
Actually this version of safegurad is not behaving properly with some tests which fail for different reasons.

For example there is a bug in the implementation for jitter where if you provide 0 as value it will fail.
Another problem I've noticed is when you run the tests for fault tolerance they fail because some embedded classes in safeguard are not recognized as CDI beans and when and instance have to be injected during test run test fails.

If I add the these classes as part of the module and also add metrics API as test dependency test passes.

That is why I asked where such problems can be reported back to safeguard developers.
I can't find anything in Jirra regarding safeguard.

On 7.1.2019 г. 13:16, Roberto Cortez [via TomEE & OpenEJB] wrote:
Yes,

There is already a 1.1 Geronimo implementation compliant version (Safeguard). JL added it, but it was failing the TCK. We think we need to do some integration code to be able to use it properly. Bruno was going to do that, so we reverted back to 1.0 version so we can have a green build until we figure that out.

Please check the following thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E>

Cheers,
Roberto

> On 6 Jan 2019, at 19:47, David Blevins <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Noticed we're using Fault Tolerance 1.0, whereas MicroProfile 2.0 has Fault Tolerance 1.1.
>
> Is there a 1.1 implementation we can use?
>
>
> --
> David Blevins
> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>




If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687306.html
To start a new topic under TomEE Dev, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from TomEE Dev, click here.
NAML


-- 
Doychin Bondzhev
dSoft-Bulgaria Ltd.
PowerPro - billing & provisioning solution for Service providers
http://www.dsoft-bg.com/
Mobile: +359888243116

doychin.vcf (280 bytes) Download Attachment
smime.p7s (7K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: MicroProfile Fault Tolerance 1.1?

Roberto Cortez
Hi Doychin,

Safeguard is implemented under the Geronimo project umbrella, so if you need to report any issue, you need to report them in Geronimo JIRA:
https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO <https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO>

Here you can find some issues:
https://jira.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20GERONIMO%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22safeguard%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC <https://jira.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%20GERONIMO%20AND%20resolution%20=%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22safeguard%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20updated%20DESC>

Hope it helps!

Cheers,
Roberto

> On 7 Jan 2019, at 11:46, Doychin Bondzhev <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Actually this version of safegurad is not behaving properly with some tests which fail for different reasons.
>
> For example there is a bug in the implementation for jitter where if you provide 0 as value it will fail.
> Another problem I've noticed is when you run the tests for fault tolerance they fail because some embedded classes in safeguard are not recognized as CDI beans and when and instance have to be injected during test run test fails.
>
> If I add the these classes as part of the module and also add metrics API as test dependency test passes.
>
> That is why I asked where such problems can be reported back to safeguard developers.
> I can't find anything in Jirra regarding safeguard.
>
> On 7.1.2019 г. 13:16, Roberto Cortez [via TomEE & OpenEJB] wrote:
>> Yes,
>>
>> There is already a 1.1 Geronimo implementation compliant version (Safeguard). JL added it, but it was failing the TCK. We think we need to do some integration code to be able to use it properly. Bruno was going to do that, so we reverted back to 1.0 version so we can have a green build until we figure that out.
>>
>> Please check the following thread:
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Roberto
>>
>> > On 6 Jan 2019, at 19:47, David Blevins <[hidden email] <x-msg://59/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4687306&i=0>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Noticed we're using Fault Tolerance 1.0, whereas MicroProfile 2.0 has Fault Tolerance 1.1.
>> >
>> > Is there a 1.1 implementation we can use?
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > David Blevins
>> > http://twitter.com/dblevins <http://twitter.com/dblevins>
>> > http://www.tomitribe.com <http://www.tomitribe.com/>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687306.html <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687306.html>
>> To start a new topic under TomEE Dev, email [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>> To unsubscribe from TomEE Dev, click here <
>> NAML <
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
> --
> Doychin Bondzhev
> dSoft-Bulgaria Ltd.
> PowerPro - billing & provisioning solution for Service providers
> http://www.dsoft-bg.com/ <http://www.dsoft-bg.com/>
> Mobile: +359888243116
> <doychin.vcf>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: MicroProfile Fault Tolerance 1.1?

doychin@dsoft-bg.com
Thanks Roberto,

Strange thing is that when I click the link that should display unresolved issues of safeguard I don't see any issues.

I also don't see any issues at all when I remove the filter for status.

On 7.1.2019 г. 14:10, Roberto Cortez [via TomEE & OpenEJB] wrote:
Hi Doychin,

Safeguard is implemented under the Geronimo project umbrella, so if you need to report any issue, you need to report them in Geronimo JIRA:
https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO <https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO>

Here you can find some issues:
https://jira.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20GERONIMO%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22safeguard%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC <https://jira.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%20GERONIMO%20AND%20resolution%20=%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22safeguard%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20updated%20DESC>

Hope it helps!

Cheers,
Roberto

> On 7 Jan 2019, at 11:46, Doychin Bondzhev <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Actually this version of safegurad is not behaving properly with some tests which fail for different reasons.
>
> For example there is a bug in the implementation for jitter where if you provide 0 as value it will fail.
> Another problem I've noticed is when you run the tests for fault tolerance they fail because some embedded classes in safeguard are not recognized as CDI beans and when and instance have to be injected during test run test fails.
>
> If I add the these classes as part of the module and also add metrics API as test dependency test passes.
>
> That is why I asked where such problems can be reported back to safeguard developers.
> I can't find anything in Jirra regarding safeguard.
>
> On 7.1.2019 г. 13:16, Roberto Cortez [via TomEE & OpenEJB] wrote:
>> Yes,
>>
>> There is already a 1.1 Geronimo implementation compliant version (Safeguard). JL added it, but it was failing the TCK. We think we need to do some integration code to be able to use it properly. Bruno was going to do that, so we reverted back to 1.0 version so we can have a green build until we figure that out.
>>
>> Please check the following thread:
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Roberto
>>
>> > On 6 Jan 2019, at 19:47, David Blevins <[hidden email] <x-msg://59/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4687306&i=0>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Noticed we're using Fault Tolerance 1.0, whereas MicroProfile 2.0 has Fault Tolerance 1.1.
>> >
>> > Is there a 1.1 implementation we can use?
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > David Blevins
>> > http://twitter.com/dblevins <http://twitter.com/dblevins>
>> > http://www.tomitribe.com <http://www.tomitribe.com/>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687306.html <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687306.html>
>> To start a new topic under TomEE Dev, email [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>> To unsubscribe from TomEE Dev, click here <
>> NAML <
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
> --
> Doychin Bondzhev
> dSoft-Bulgaria Ltd.
> PowerPro - billing & provisioning solution for Service providers
> http://www.dsoft-bg.com/ <http://www.dsoft-bg.com/>
> Mobile: +359888243116
> <doychin.vcf>




If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687315.html
To start a new topic under TomEE Dev, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from TomEE Dev, click here.
NAML


-- 
Doychin Bondzhev
dSoft-Bulgaria Ltd.
PowerPro - billing & provisioning solution for Service providers
http://www.dsoft-bg.com/
Mobile: +359888243116

doychin.vcf (280 bytes) Download Attachment
smime.p7s (7K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: MicroProfile Fault Tolerance 1.1?

Roberto Cortez
Hum… weird. Apparently you need to be logged in. Do you have an Apache JIRA account? If not, just create one and try again, please.

> On 7 Jan 2019, at 12:42, Doychin Bondzhev <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Roberto,
>
> Strange thing is that when I click the link that should display unresolved issues of safeguard I don't see any issues.
>
> I also don't see any issues at all when I remove the filter for status.
>
> On 7.1.2019 г. 14:10, Roberto Cortez [via TomEE & OpenEJB] wrote:
>> Hi Doychin,
>>
>> Safeguard is implemented under the Geronimo project umbrella, so if you need to report any issue, you need to report them in Geronimo JIRA:
>> https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO <https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO> <https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO <https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO>>
>>
>> Here you can find some issues:
>> https://jira.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20GERONIMO%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22safeguard%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC <https://jira.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20GERONIMO%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22safeguard%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC> <https://jira.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%20GERONIMO%20AND%20resolution%20=%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22safeguard%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20updated%20DESC <https://jira.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%20GERONIMO%20AND%20resolution%20=%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22safeguard%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20updated%20DESC>>
>>
>> Hope it helps!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Roberto
>>
>> > On 7 Jan 2019, at 11:46, Doychin Bondzhev <[hidden email] <x-msg://64/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4687315&i=0>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Actually this version of safegurad is not behaving properly with some tests which fail for different reasons.
>> >
>> > For example there is a bug in the implementation for jitter where if you provide 0 as value it will fail.
>> > Another problem I've noticed is when you run the tests for fault tolerance they fail because some embedded classes in safeguard are not recognized as CDI beans and when and instance have to be injected during test run test fails.
>> >
>> > If I add the these classes as part of the module and also add metrics API as test dependency test passes.
>> >
>> > That is why I asked where such problems can be reported back to safeguard developers.
>> > I can't find anything in Jirra regarding safeguard.
>> >
>> > On 7.1.2019 г. 13:16, Roberto Cortez [via TomEE & OpenEJB] wrote:
>> >> Yes,
>> >>
>> >> There is already a 1.1 Geronimo implementation compliant version (Safeguard). JL added it, but it was failing the TCK. We think we need to do some integration code to be able to use it properly. Bruno was going to do that, so we reverted back to 1.0 version so we can have a green build until we figure that out.
>> >>
>> >> Please check the following thread:
>> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E>>>
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Roberto
>> >>
>> >> > On 6 Jan 2019, at 19:47, David Blevins <[hidden email] <x-msg://59/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4687306&i=0>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Noticed we're using Fault Tolerance 1.0, whereas MicroProfile 2.0 has Fault Tolerance 1.1.
>> >> >
>> >> > Is there a 1.1 implementation we can use?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > David Blevins
>> >> > http://twitter.com/dblevins <http://twitter.com/dblevins> <http://twitter.com/dblevins <http://twitter.com/dblevins>>
>> >> > http://www.tomitribe.com <http://www.tomitribe.com/> <http://www.tomitribe.com/ <http://www.tomitribe.com/>>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
>> >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687306.html <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687306.html> <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687306.html <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687306.html>>
>> >> To start a new topic under TomEE Dev, email [hidden email] <x-msg://64/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4687315&i=1> <mailto:[hidden email] <x-msg://64/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4687315&i=2>>
>> >> To unsubscribe from TomEE Dev, click here <
>> >> NAML < <applewebdata://D2EE015D-7987-4EA0-9692-6E41DC78EB3D>http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>>
>> > --
>> > Doychin Bondzhev
>> > dSoft-Bulgaria Ltd.
>> > PowerPro - billing & provisioning solution for Service providers
>> > http://www.dsoft-bg.com/ <http://www.dsoft-bg.com/> <http://www.dsoft-bg.com/ <http://www.dsoft-bg.com/>>
>> > Mobile: +359888243116
>> > <doychin.vcf>
>>
>>
>>
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687315.html <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687315.html>
>> To start a new topic under TomEE Dev, email [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>> To unsubscribe from TomEE Dev, click here <
>> NAML <
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
> --
> Doychin Bondzhev
> dSoft-Bulgaria Ltd.
> PowerPro - billing & provisioning solution for Service providers
> http://www.dsoft-bg.com/ <http://www.dsoft-bg.com/>
> Mobile: +359888243116
> <doychin.vcf>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: MicroProfile Fault Tolerance 1.1?

doychin@dsoft-bg.com
I see now two issues.

I will try to report the the problem I found with jitter now.

On 7.1.2019 г. 15:05, Roberto Cortez [via TomEE & OpenEJB] wrote:
Hum… weird. Apparently you need to be logged in. Do you have an Apache JIRA account? If not, just create one and try again, please.

> On 7 Jan 2019, at 12:42, Doychin Bondzhev <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Roberto,
>
> Strange thing is that when I click the link that should display unresolved issues of safeguard I don't see any issues.
>
> I also don't see any issues at all when I remove the filter for status.
>
> On 7.1.2019 г. 14:10, Roberto Cortez [via TomEE & OpenEJB] wrote:
>> Hi Doychin,
>>
>> Safeguard is implemented under the Geronimo project umbrella, so if you need to report any issue, you need to report them in Geronimo JIRA:
>> https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO <https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO> <https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO <https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO>>
>>
>> Here you can find some issues:
>> https://jira.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20GERONIMO%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22safeguard%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC <https://jira.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20GERONIMO%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22safeguard%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC> <https://jira.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%20GERONIMO%20AND%20resolution%20=%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22safeguard%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20updated%20DESC <https://jira.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%20GERONIMO%20AND%20resolution%20=%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22safeguard%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20updated%20DESC>>
>>
>> Hope it helps!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Roberto
>>
>> > On 7 Jan 2019, at 11:46, Doychin Bondzhev <[hidden email] <x-msg://64/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4687315&i=0>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Actually this version of safegurad is not behaving properly with some tests which fail for different reasons.
>> >
>> > For example there is a bug in the implementation for jitter where if you provide 0 as value it will fail.
>> > Another problem I've noticed is when you run the tests for fault tolerance they fail because some embedded classes in safeguard are not recognized as CDI beans and when and instance have to be injected during test run test fails.
>> >
>> > If I add the these classes as part of the module and also add metrics API as test dependency test passes.
>> >
>> > That is why I asked where such problems can be reported back to safeguard developers.
>> > I can't find anything in Jirra regarding safeguard.
>> >
>> > On 7.1.2019 г. 13:16, Roberto Cortez [via TomEE & OpenEJB] wrote:
>> >> Yes,
>> >>
>> >> There is already a 1.1 Geronimo implementation compliant version (Safeguard). JL added it, but it was failing the TCK. We think we need to do some integration code to be able to use it properly. Bruno was going to do that, so we reverted back to 1.0 version so we can have a green build until we figure that out.
>> >>
>> >> Please check the following thread:
>> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E>>>
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Roberto
>> >>
>> >> > On 6 Jan 2019, at 19:47, David Blevins <[hidden email] <x-msg://59/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4687306&i=0>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Noticed we're using Fault Tolerance 1.0, whereas MicroProfile 2.0 has Fault Tolerance 1.1.
>> >> >
>> >> > Is there a 1.1 implementation we can use?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > David Blevins
>> >> > http://twitter.com/dblevins <http://twitter.com/dblevins> <http://twitter.com/dblevins <http://twitter.com/dblevins>>
>> >> > http://www.tomitribe.com <http://www.tomitribe.com/> <http://www.tomitribe.com/ <http://www.tomitribe.com/>>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
>> >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687306.html <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687306.html> <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687306.html <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687306.html>>
>> >> To start a new topic under TomEE Dev, email [hidden email] <x-msg://64/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4687315&i=1> <mailto:[hidden email] <x-msg://64/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4687315&i=2>>
>> >> To unsubscribe from TomEE Dev, click here <
>> >> NAML < <applewebdata://D2EE015D-7987-4EA0-9692-6E41DC78EB3D>http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>>
>> > --
>> > Doychin Bondzhev
>> > dSoft-Bulgaria Ltd.
>> > PowerPro - billing & provisioning solution for Service providers
>> > http://www.dsoft-bg.com/ <http://www.dsoft-bg.com/> <http://www.dsoft-bg.com/ <http://www.dsoft-bg.com/>>
>> > Mobile: +359888243116
>> > <doychin.vcf>
>>
>>
>>
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687315.html <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687315.html>
>> To start a new topic under TomEE Dev, email [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
>> To unsubscribe from TomEE Dev, click here <
>> NAML <
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
> --
> Doychin Bondzhev
> dSoft-Bulgaria Ltd.
> PowerPro - billing & provisioning solution for Service providers
> http://www.dsoft-bg.com/ <http://www.dsoft-bg.com/>
> Mobile: +359888243116
> <doychin.vcf>




If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687319.html
To start a new topic under TomEE Dev, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from TomEE Dev, click here.
NAML


-- 
Doychin Bondzhev
dSoft-Bulgaria Ltd.
PowerPro - billing & provisioning solution for Service providers
http://www.dsoft-bg.com/
Mobile: +359888243116

doychin.vcf (280 bytes) Download Attachment
smime.p7s (7K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: MicroProfile Fault Tolerance 1.1?

brunobat
Hi Doychin,

The jitter issue has been fixed in the latest snapshot.

Cheers

Bruno Baptista
https://twitter.com/brunobat_


On 07/01/19 14:31, Doychin Bondzhev wrote:

> I see now two issues.
>
> I will try to report the the problem I found with jitter now.
>
> On 7.1.2019 г. 15:05, Roberto Cortez [via TomEE & OpenEJB] wrote:
>> Hum… weird. Apparently you need to be logged in. Do you have an
>> Apache JIRA account? If not, just create one and try again, please.
>>
>> > On 7 Jan 2019, at 12:42, Doychin Bondzhev <[hidden email]
>> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4687319&i=0>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks Roberto,
>> >
>> > Strange thing is that when I click the link that should display
>> unresolved issues of safeguard I don't see any issues.
>> >
>> > I also don't see any issues at all when I remove the filter for
>> status.
>> >
>> > On 7.1.2019 г. 14:10, Roberto Cortez [via TomEE & OpenEJB] wrote:
>> >> Hi Doychin,
>> >>
>> >> Safeguard is implemented under the Geronimo project umbrella, so
>> if you need to report any issue, you need to report them in Geronimo
>> JIRA:
>> >>
>> https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO <https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO>
>> <https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO <https://jira.apache.org/jira/projects/GERONIMO>>
>>
>> >>
>> >> Here you can find some issues:
>> >>
>> https://jira.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20GERONIMO%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22safeguard%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC <https://jira.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20GERONIMO%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22safeguard%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC>
>> <https://jira.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%20GERONIMO%20AND%20resolution%20=%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22safeguard%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20updated%20DESC <https://jira.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%20GERONIMO%20AND%20resolution%20=%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22safeguard%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20updated%20DESC>>
>>
>> >>
>> >> Hope it helps!
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Roberto
>> >>
>> >> > On 7 Jan 2019, at 11:46, Doychin Bondzhev <[hidden email]
>> <x-msg://64/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4687315&i=0>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Actually this version of safegurad is not behaving properly with
>> some tests which fail for different reasons.
>> >> >
>> >> > For example there is a bug in the implementation for jitter
>> where if you provide 0 as value it will fail.
>> >> > Another problem I've noticed is when you run the tests for fault
>> tolerance they fail because some embedded classes in safeguard are
>> not recognized as CDI beans and when and instance have to be injected
>> during test run test fails.
>> >> >
>> >> > If I add the these classes as part of the module and also add
>> metrics API as test dependency test passes.
>> >> >
>> >> > That is why I asked where such problems can be reported back to
>> safeguard developers.
>> >> > I can't find anything in Jirra regarding safeguard.
>> >> >
>> >> > On 7.1.2019 г. 13:16, Roberto Cortez [via TomEE & OpenEJB] wrote:
>> >> >> Yes,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> There is already a 1.1 Geronimo implementation compliant
>> version (Safeguard). JL added it, but it was failing the TCK. We
>> think we need to do some integration code to be able to use it
>> properly. Bruno was going to do that, so we reverted back to 1.0
>> version so we can have a green build until we figure that out.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please check the following thread:
>> >> >>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E>
>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E>>
>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E>
>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0bc1c82d064f16f1cf0a5b70a9670cfcabe6b6aa9b0397fa396638f6@%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E>>>
>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Cheers,
>> >> >> Roberto
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > On 6 Jan 2019, at 19:47, David Blevins <[hidden email]
>> <x-msg://59/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4687306&i=0>> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Noticed we're using Fault Tolerance 1.0, whereas MicroProfile
>> 2.0 has Fault Tolerance 1.1.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Is there a 1.1 implementation we can use?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > David Blevins
>> >> >> > http://twitter.com/dblevins <http://twitter.com/dblevins>
>> <http://twitter.com/dblevins <http://twitter.com/dblevins>>
>> >> >> > http://www.tomitribe.com <http://www.tomitribe.com/>
>> <http://www.tomitribe.com/ <http://www.tomitribe.com/>>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> discussion below:
>> >> >>
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687306.html <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687306.html>
>> <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687306.html <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687306.html>>
>>
>> >> >> To start a new topic under TomEE Dev, email [hidden email]
>> <x-msg://64/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4687315&i=1>
>> <mailto:[hidden email]
>> <x-msg://64/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4687315&i=2>>
>> >> >> To unsubscribe from TomEE Dev, click here <
>> >> >> NAML <
>> <applewebdata://D2EE015D-7987-4EA0-9692-6E41DC78EB3D>http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>>
>>
>> >> > --
>> >> > Doychin Bondzhev
>> >> > dSoft-Bulgaria Ltd.
>> >> > PowerPro - billing & provisioning solution for Service providers
>> >> > http://www.dsoft-bg.com/ <http://www.dsoft-bg.com/>
>> <http://www.dsoft-bg.com/ <http://www.dsoft-bg.com/>>
>> >> > Mobile: +359888243116
>> >> > <doychin.vcf>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> discussion below:
>> >>
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687315.html <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687315.html>
>>
>> >> To start a new topic under TomEE Dev, email [hidden email]
>> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4687319&i=1> <mailto:[hidden
>> email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4687319&i=2>>
>> >> To unsubscribe from TomEE Dev, click here <
>> >> NAML
>> <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>>
>> > --
>> > Doychin Bondzhev
>> > dSoft-Bulgaria Ltd.
>> > PowerPro - billing & provisioning solution for Service providers
>> > http://www.dsoft-bg.com/ <http://www.dsoft-bg.com/>
>> > Mobile: +359888243116
>> > <doychin.vcf>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> discussion below:
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/MicroProfile-Fault-Tolerance-1-1-tp4687293p4687319.html 
>>
>> To start a new topic under TomEE Dev, email
>> [hidden email]
>> To unsubscribe from TomEE Dev, click here
>> <
>> NAML
>> <
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>>
>
>
> --
> Doychin Bondzhev
> dSoft-Bulgaria Ltd.
> PowerPro - billing & provisioning solution for Service providers
> http://www.dsoft-bg.com/
> Mobile: +359888243116