rzo1 commented on a change in pull request #776:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/776#discussion_r605572170##########
File path: container/openejb-core/pom.xml
##########
@@ -562,11 +562,31 @@
<!-- End: JavaMail -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.xbean</groupId>
- <artifactId>xbean-asm7-shaded</artifactId>
+ <artifactId>xbean-asm9-shaded</artifactId>
+ <exclusions>
+ <exclusion>
+ <groupId>org.ow2.asm</groupId>
+ <artifactId>asm</artifactId>
+ </exclusion>
+ <exclusion>
+ <groupId>org.ow2.asm</groupId>
+ <artifactId>asm-commons</artifactId>
+ </exclusion>
+ </exclusions>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.xbean</groupId>
<artifactId>xbean-finder-shaded</artifactId>
+ <exclusions>
Review comment:
see above
##########
File path: arquillian/arquillian-tomee-common/pom.xml
##########
@@ -86,6 +86,16 @@
<artifactId>xbean-finder-shaded</artifactId>
<version>${xbeanVersion}</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
+ <exclusions>
Review comment:
I am wondering:
Is this needed? Afaik [xbean-finder-shaded](
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.xbean/xbean-finder-shaded/4.18) only has a compile dependency towards `xbean-asm9-shaded`. The `org.ow2.asm` stuff is a transient dependency of `xbean-asm9-shaded`. So shouldn't we exclude `xbean-asm9-shaded` here as it comes from `openwebbeans` anyway?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[hidden email]